New history books designed by Leftists to be used to teach how 150 years ago, Whites whipped Blacks every 30 days in order to drive them out, how Indians were cheated by Whites, etc. etc.
If we thought things were bad now, wait until Black and Hispanic children are being taught how mean and hateful the Whites were to Non-whites in this country. The school lessons will go on to teach that racism was coded into our Constitution and is still there! Meanwhile, Pelosi is stating that cities in Iraq were saved, not by America, but by Iran!
(Brit Hume today on Fox News)
Also Soros’ money behind McClelland’s new book. (Limbaugh today).
My thoughts: The Socialists, Marxists and some Islamics really know how to tear this country apart. making it easier to take over our government by dividing Americans into racial and cultural groups, teaching hatred of their past and a distrust of the American fundamentals of freedom, thus causing future voters to vote for socialist concepts.Their coded phrase for this is “Political Correctness.”
It may not take as long as Osama bin Laden first thought to see an Islamic flag flying over our nation’s Capitol, thanks to our schools being infiltrated by the Far Left followers who hate America and want to see Barack Obama take over our government and lead us into becoming a Socialist country.
Do we as Republicans who believe in a free capitalistic America as this nation under God just sit back and watch this happening or dos this silent majority once again start to make itself heard? Is the Left the only group that dares to protest?
Your thoughts?
Lee
Is the Democratic party really the party of the people? Claims are made all the time. Talking heads assert that the Dems are the party of the poor, the immigrants. Yet reality would say otherwise. Latino voters aren’t a homogenous group from the country of Latinia. They are comprised of immigrants and natural born citizens from Mexico, Columbia, Puerto Rico, Argentina, Brazil and Cuba, among others. We’ve heard a great deal from the left about whether Latinos will choose Hillary or Obama, as if its a foregone conclusion that this demographic is firmly planted in their camp. But since the 1980s sociologists have seen a trend of Hispanics away from the left. Tonight’s show was supposed to be a debate with members of both sides talking about the issues. Angel Sanchez, state Vice Chair of the California Republican National Hispanic Assembly and a delegate to the California Republican Party and Hector Barajas, Director of Communications for the California Republican Party came ready to talk. From the Democrats … Not a single response. I promised to keep it all above-board - no set-up, no hidden agenda. Tonight I called Angel Sanchez the man the Democrats fear most. Is that it? Or do they fear exposing themselves to dialogue? We hear their views in sound bites and as responses to questions from their own party. But standing next to the Republicans and facing the challenges from you, my loyal listeners, was obviously too much. If you missed the show, download it now and listen in as the Man the Democrats Most Fear speaks.
You can listen to the entire show here.
According to a story in the U.K Telegraph, temperatures in the U.S are falling and have been since 1998.
The scare over global warming, and our politicians’ response to it, is becoming ever more bizarre. On the one hand we have the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change coming up with yet another of its notoriously politicised reports, hyping up the scare by claiming that world surface temperatures have been higher in 11 of the past 12 years (1995-2006) than ever previously recorded.
This carefully ignores the latest US satellite figures showing temperatures having fallen since 1998, declining in 2007 to a 1983 level - not to mention the newly revised figures for US surface temperatures showing that the 1930s had four of the 10 warmest years of the past century, with the hottest year of all being not 1998, as was previously claimed, but 1934.
Read the entire story here
According to this article in SFgate.com, the Bay Area Quality Management District is considering banning the use of fireplaces to reduce the amount of polluntants entering the atmosphere. Are you freaking kidding me? There are still many people who heat there home using fireplaces (many poor people I might add) and restricting this will require them to turn to alternative sources of heat such as Natural Gas or Electric appliances. Does this really do any good? Especially in an area like SF where the temperatures are almost always mildly cool. Besides, how many people use wood burning fireplaces on a daily basis anyway?
They investigate these foolish policies under the mythical theories of Global Warming, so instead of talking about how stupid these actions are, let’s talk about myth of Global Warming (at least how Al Gore is classifying it).
This week Anthony Vultaggio talks to self-made multi-millionaire Al Parinello about the Democratic agenda. Get ready for a controversial, no-holds-barred interview where Al reveals the secret agenda of Obama, Clinton and the rest of the Democrats.
Al is the author of the best-selling media/marketing book, On The Air and the founder and president of Preserve the American Dream, an organization dedicated to empowering all people to pursue and live the American Dream.
According to Al, “The only thing Democrats have done for the poor is to keep them in poverty. And that’s EXACTLY where they want them!”
Tune in live to hear Al’s take on:
* Why Democrats want to re-distributing wealth to those who least deserve it.
* The real reason class warfare exists – and why the Democrats benefit the most from it.
* Which of the current crop of Democratic presidential candidates benefits the most by keeping Americans poor.
Special guest: comedian Mike Marino will call in live from the Laugh Factory in Los Angeles to add his take on these issues and more. You won’t want to miss it!
Listen live this Saturday from 9-10 PM Pacific on KRLA 870AM. The show can also be heard live on the web.
Simply visit http://www.ResultsDrivenRadio.com and follow the links to listen live. A podcast of the show will be available on http://www.ResultsDrivenRadio.com or via iTunes on Monday, November 26, 2007.
Got an opinion? Call 866-870-5752 and sound off.
Anthony Vultaggio
Host of Results Driven Radio
http://www.ResultsDrivenRadio.com
P.S. Last Saturday presidential hopeful Alan Keyes
joined me to talk about the real issues that plague
America. If you missed the show, you can download it
by visiting:
I was glad to hear Rush say today on his radio program what I have been urging for the last few months --- that this 2008 election is not just about the war, our defense, or our economy. It is about whether this country will become a Socialist nation or whether it will remain a Republic as envisioned by our forefathers.
I believe that the pivotal point of 2008 is based on whether the Left finally takes complete control of this nation and its political future. All Republicans, Independents and Conservative Democrats must vote for a Republican President and a Republican congressional majority in 2008 as they did when Ronald Reagan won. Many authorities have told us that just one or two wrong votes cast (or not cast) in each USA county can make the difference.
Never has any election been as important to America as will be this one. The 2008 vote can do to America what al Qaeda or Communist or Socialist Fronts in the USA have failed to accomplish, or it can save this country.
We will no longer be voting for the best man or woman for the job of President; we will be voting, instead, for a philosophy of government --- a philosophy of freedom, a strong national defense with the ability to win against attackers, lower taxation that creates more jobs and opportunities for all, and a return to family values of decency that Hollywood, the music industry and network TV have all tried to destroy. We will also acknowledge that we are still a nation under God.
Regardless of who becomes the Republican Presidential nominee, we must get out the vote for him.
Our votes have never been this important for our nation!
Written by Lee Ellis
According to an Associated Press report, Richmond is one of the top 10 most dangerous cities in the United States.
Yet. They had plenty of time to put together resolutions condeming the War on Terror and the War in Iraq. How can a city that has continued to deteriorate take the time to put together a fruitless resolution.
Let’s analyze the Resolution.
Resolution of the City of Richmond Opposing U.S. Military Involvement in Iraq and Iran
Whereas, current U.S. foreign policy in the middle-east is counterproductive [wait, isn’t this resolution counterproductive] with respect to the interests of the American people and the peoples of the middle-east [how about caring about the dead and victimized in your own city]; and
Whereas, the initial invasion of Iraq was based on false and misleading information about yet undiscovered “weapons of mass destruction” [you mean the evidence of dead Khurds and a leader who failed to allow inspectors to do their job] and unsubstantiated ties between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda in Iraq presented by the Bush Administration to the U.S. Congress, the United Nations, and the American people; and
Whereas, continued presence of the U.S. military in Iraq as an occupying army, a situation which has already gone on longer than the U.S. involvement in World War II [I guess their schools are failing too; because 1941 - 1952 (the occupying time we were in Japan) is about 11 years vs ,<5 years. Oh I guess they wanted to play with those numbers too]- is not leading to peace and/or a stable and sovereign Iraq under the control of the people of Iraq [Haven’t they had 3 free democratic elections already?] ;and
Whereas, polls conducted by the most reputable and accurate U.S. polling organizations have shown that the vast majority of Iraqis want the United States military to leave their country; [I’m sorry, what kind of poll was this exactly? Was it a telephone poll? Well 28,000,000 people in Iraq and only about 1,700,000 landlines and if they answer the phone the way most Americans do then I doubt the polls are super accurate. Maybe they went door to door] and
I have always supported the idea of Global Warming. I also support the concept of Global Cooling. The earth has no doubtedly been warming over the last few years; however, I have never agreed with the “sky is falling” predictions that Al Gore and his kool-aid drinkers have been putting forth. The earth goes through cycles. It cools. It heats up. There are wet years. There are dry years. Things work in cycles. Now don’t get me wrong, we don’t need to step up our polluting of the atmosphere, Lord knows the earth is doing a good enough job of it with all of the volcanoes and such.
Al Gore Wrong Again
Posted by ReasonMcLucus at 05:54 on 16 Nov 2007On October 14, 1997, Vice President Al Gore said, “For those who argue that global warming is already changing the world’s climate, this year’s El Nino weather front is more than enough evidence”, the audience was told by Gore. In the next day, a report by the San Francisco Chronicle said: “Gore links El Nino to Global Warming”. The Vice President stated at the summit that growing frequency of El Nino episodes could be connected to the gradual heating of the atmosphere caused by emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
Ten years later residents in Argentina and Brazil are wondering if this winter will ever end. Buenos Aires recorded this Thursday (November 15th) the lowest November temperature in 90 years. Temperature in the Downtown weather station reached 2.5C. Since records began more than a century ago, only two days had colder lows in November. It was in 1914 (1.6) and 1917 (2.4). And ninety years ago the urban heat island effect was much less pronounced than nowadays. In Brazil’s southernmost province Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil temperatures fell to 2.3C. In Sao Joaquim Monda’s (Nov., 12) the temperature was -1.2 C with frost.
The prospect that, somehow, somewhere, the government will smile on something religious strikes more fear in some people than would a federal endorsement of binge-drinking. Yet, despite the efforts of those obsessed with slippery slopes, zero tolerance, and political correction, Americans still have the right to worship or to mock, as their sensibilities direct. To deny public funding of an “artist” that immerses a crucifix in urine is seen, by some, as censorship, yet the muzzling of the American Legion is not. It all depends on whose speech is being gored.
At the State Bar Convention, in August, I had the opportunity of asking an attorney from the ACLU: “What’s wrong with putting a cross on a county seal?” The answer was that someone might be “offended”, as though the purpose of the Establishment Clause was to protect secular sensibilities. This oppressive point of view led to the tearing down of the Mojave cross. And, yet, Riverside’s own National Cemetery is home to thousands of crosses, Magen Davids, and other religious symbols on nearly every tombstone. This brings us to the flag-folding ceremony.
I recently had to bury one of my friends there. He was laid to rest with a solemn, moving flag- folding ceremony, performed by the American Legion. In that ceremony, the American flag is folded thirteen times, in honor of the thirteen original American colonies. Each fold is accompanied by a short, historical reference. This ceremony was performed by an honor guard made up of American Legion veterans as a tribute to their fallen comrade.
The American Legion performs the flag-folding ceremony hundreds of times a week at funerals throughout the nation’s 125 federal cemeteries. During one of these funerals, someone found one of the folds to be offensive. The Eleventh Fold represents the lower portion of the seal of King David and King Solomon, and glorifies the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The Twelfth Fold represents an emblem of eternity and glorifies God the Father, the Son and Holy Ghost. Unfortunately, the offended party had enough influence to get the White House to direct the Department of Veterans’ Affairs to direct the Director of Cemetery Administration to direct the American Legion to quit performing the ceremony as of September 27 in the Year of Our Lord (Anno Domini) 2007.
Charles Walters, the American Legion’s parliamentarian, is telling the group to ignore the government’s order: “There are twenty-six million veterans in this country and they’re not going to take us all to prison.” He’s right. What is the penalty for recitation during a flag folding? What gives the federal government jurisdiction over the American Legion? What gives the government the right to forbid a religious ceremony?
We know what gives the American Legion the right to perform that ceremony: it’s the First Amendment. “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”, says the Constitution. The Executive Branch has the authority to issue directives to its various departments, but there can be no federal law punishing the American Legion for ignoring that directive. And, if the American Legion is banned: that’s an Equal Protection problem. The bereaved have- or should have- the right to hear the ceremony of their choice by the American Legion, if they so choose. The law, then, should tell the thin-skinned to respect the sensibilities of the not-so-thin-skinned, living and dead.
To paraphrase Justice Abe Fortas’ reality-detached statement in Tinker v. Des Moines 393 U.S. 503 (1969): the bereaved do not shed their constitutional rights at the graveyard gate. According to the Tinker court, students have a right to wear black armbands in class, yet, somehow, the American Legion must fold in silence or use a more sanitized ritual. Flag-burning is protected speech, according to the court in Texas v. Johnson 491 U.S. 397 (1989). Flag-folding, apparently, is not quite as protected. Thanks to the intervention of former ACLU attorney (now anti-ACLU attorney) Rees Lloyd, Vice-president Dick Cheney had the order rescinded. The free exercise of religion is, for the moment, safe behind its wall of separation.
Written by Richard Reed, Esq.
Please join me in welcoming Richard Reed to cc4truth.
Richard is originally from Texas and moved to California in 1958. He has a Bachelor’s Degree in History and Theatre from California Baptist College and received his teaching credentials from the University of Riverside, California. For nearly a decade he was a public school teacher in Riverside before he opened his own touring theatre company. In 2000, he received his Juris Doctorate from California Southern Law School and today practices law. He is a writer for the Riverside Lawyer Magazine and the Los Angeles Journal. Additionally, he is active in Republican Politics and is an elected member of the Republican Central Committee of Riverside County. He still loves theatre and has served on the board of the Riverside Dickens Festival.
It is an honor to welcome Richard.
Heard the Democrat debates tonight. General consensus from commentators afterwards was that Hillary was back in stride and the winner!
Obama is real scary; Kucinich and Ron Paul are alike in their insanity.
One question asked was what each would require of an appointee for the Supreme Court? Every candidate demanded that each Court candidate would have to agree with the “Right to privacy and to agree that Roe vs Wade was legal. In other words, Right to Privacy was the code for abortion. I guess that if you murder someone, anyone, in privacy, it is legal and OK under the “Right for Choice” that these candidates for the presidency want. And they want to be sure that a future Supreme Court will grant this right.
Still wondering if your vote for a Republican President is worth it? I guess it depends on what kind of a Supreme Court you want for your Grandchildren.
Written by Lee Ellis
PS Wolf Blitzer lost control from the beginning.
Friends, Thursday on the Brit Hume News Show, Mort Kondracke, a Democrat of the old school, said that today’s Leftist Democrats (referring to Harry Reid’s and Nancy Pelosi’s congressional attack on the troops) are playing “chicken” with the troops by keeping proper funding from the Pentagon, thus risking the lives of our troops who are successfully fighting al Qaeda in the Middle East.
According to the news reports, the Democrats were going to keep the troops properly funded, but when Move-On. Org, Kos and other far left anti-war groups put the pressure back on, the elected Democrats fell back into line. Reid then set up another bill to stop defending America by cutting the necessary funds for our troops so they would not be able to finish their drive for a safe and allied Iraq by driving out the terrorists
Now do we all understand why our vote is so essential next year? If George Soros and the other Socialist and Communist fronts control the Democrat Party, and thus both the Congress and the Presidency starting in 2009, al Qaeda will triumph in its takeover of the entire Middle East and innocent American civilians will be in great danger here in the USA!
Plan now to elect winners for America, not those who accept the Far Left as their guide for losing and surrender!
Support our troops; Support our Republic!
Written by Lee Ellis
Again, the newscasts are full of Congressional members arguing over the definition of torture and whether the USA has committed it.
As almost any combat veteran can testify, torture is that which causes blood to leak or spurt and causes severe damage to the human body - the removal of fingers, toes, ears or nose or even blinding people, as has been done in the past not only by enemies in wars, but also by Saddam and his torture room guards. It is also bamboo pieces of wood hammered into fingernails or hundreds of cuts that savage a face or body, leaving scars for a lifetime.
So called water-boarding, and intensive interrogation done by the USA, do none of these things. In fact, we water-board our own troops in order to make them understand it and not fear it if taken prisoner. If it were torture, we would not apply it to our own soldiers!
Of course, with all this world-wide publicity on television emanating from the USA TV stations, I am sure that our current enemies are also training their people, too, so they will no longer give out their terrorist plans to kill Americans or blow up American malls, schools or other arenas.
Our enemies no longer need to hire spies or moles, they just need to hire monitors to listen to American newscasts and read the New York Times to get the secrets they need to defeat us. The people who bring up our secret techniques for obtaining information are Socialist-Democrats, anti-war radicals and RINOs who are more interested in greed and power for themselves or their groups than they are in protecting innocent American civilians and American troops.
During WWII, these people might well have been tried for sedition if they had given Hitler or Tojo our secrets for winning the war against either the Axis or the Asian enemies fighting us. But then, we had censorship, black-outs, and rationing. Civilians were brought into factories for building defense and military equipment. Even Hollywood was “drafted” to make patriotic films that united the American people in the “Win the War” efforts. We do none of this now.
For the media to keep calling this “The Iraq War” is misleading. That war ended with the defeat of Saddam Hussein. After that victory, al Qaeda took over with the help of money and weapons from Iran and Syria. Al Qaeda terrorists poured across the borders into Iraq and created local incidents to make it appear as if there was a civil war. There was no such war and we are now fighting with al Qaeda, not Iraq. If the media wants to be correct, this should be called “The al Qaeda War.” We are simply using an ally, Iraq, as a base in the Middle East to better defeat terrorism.
For people like Christopher Dodd, Joe Biden and even John McCain, and for the Supreme Court to agree, that we need the Geneva Conventions today so that our enemies will treat their American prisoners in the same manner as we treat our captives, is a sick joke. Al Qaeda terrorists do not hesitate to decapitate their prisoners or to torture them slowly and painfully until dead. These non-uniformed civilian thugs from several different Middle East countries have no scruples and no sense of decency or genuine morality. For us to keep pretending that they do, or that if we simply negotiate with them, they will give us the world peace that the Miss Universe or Miss USA contestants always ask for, is beyond comprehension.
If America and its government do not wake up soon to face the realities of the world as it is in this century, then our children and grandchildren will be forced to suffer a future of domination by Middle East forces or Socialist and Communist governments.
Will they be asking why we allowed them to inherit such a world? The way you vote in 2008 will let them know in advance.
Written by Lee Ellis
I am proud to announce that joining California Conservatives For Truth is Contributing Writer Lee Ellis.
Lee Ellis is a WWII veteran who fought in the invasions of the Gilberts and the Marshall Islands in the South Pacific. After the war and college, he became a radio-TV and newspaper journalist and worked his way up to be a VP for CBS and later a VP for Gannett Publications (USA Weekend).
In the late 50s, he had the pleasure of interviewing Ronald Reagan and was so impressed with him that he worked to help him become Governor of California.
He retired in 1989 and now is prominent in Republican circles with national columns that bring in e-mail from all over the USA, from Alaska to Miami, Florida . He may be reached at indiolee@dc.rr.com He is a member of the VFW, DAV, Rotary and many Republican federations or associations. His wife of 35 years, Sharon, is the elected City Treasurer for the City of Indio.
It has been a long time since we put out effective posts; however, with the help of some new writers and a very competitive Presidential election year approaching that time is right to revive the site. Look for new post coming real soon. I know there were many who enjoyed reading this site before and expect it to come back new and improved.